• Religion Of Peace

  • Archives

  • Elisabeth was found guilty of hate speech crimes for speaking the truth about Islam. Click to donate to her legal defense fund

  • Categories

  • Meta

  • This blogsite / website is not the official website of ACT! for America, Inc. This blogsite / website is independently owned and operated by that ACT! for America chapter named on this site. The statements, positions, opinions and views expressed in this website, whether written, audible, or video, are those of the individuals and organizations making them and and do not necessarily represent the positions, views, and opinions of ACT! for America, Inc., its directors, officers, or agents. The sole official website of ACT! for America, Inc. is www.actforamerica.org
  • Statements, views, positions and opinions expressed in articles, columns, commentaries and blog posts, whether written, audible, or video, which are not the original work of the ACT! for America chapter that owns and operates this website / blogsite, and is named on this website / blogsite are not necessarily the views, positions, and opinions of the ACT! for America chapter that owns and operates this website / blogsite
  • Advertisements

Stephen Coughlin Moment: 13 Hours – Secret Soldiers of Benghazi.


Obama Fulfilling His Vow To Fight ‘Negative Stereotypes’ Of Islam

The following is a letter-to-the-editor in the Columbia Daily Herald  from Bob Crigger, Columbia, Tennessee. Crigger is obviously not fooled by Islamist propaganda and wonders why the President of the United States feels obligated to defend Islam here and around the globe. It is clearly not the duty of our president to protect a blood-thirsty political-religious system that brings death, slavery and suffering wherever it spreads.

On June 4, 2009, President Obama gave a speech at the University of Cairo in Egypt, which clearly stated his direction, policies and agenda to the Islamic world.

He stated unequivocally, “I consider it part of my responsibility as President of the United States to fight against negative stereotypes of Islam wherever they may appear.” (Emphasis mine.) Thus began Obama’s “fight” for Islam.

During the speech, President Obama gave the honored front row seats to members of the Muslim Brotherhood. This organization was banned as a radical Islamic group in Egypt because of its violent attacks against the government. Their creed is: “Allah is our objective; the Quran is our law, the Prophet is our leader; Jihad is our way; and death for the sake of Allah is the highest of our aspirations.” Their way of life is jihad or war against unbelievers.

The following year, President Obama wielded the power of the U.S. military by using the resources of American taxpayers to oust President Mubarak from his position as president. The result of his actions led to the election of a new president of Egypt, Muhammed Morsi, who by no coincidence, was the leader of the Muslim Brotherhood. A secular state was now replaced by an Islamic state with Sharia being its law.

Prior to his election, Morsi made the following statement, “We must not forget to nurse our children and grandchildren on hatred towards those Zionists and Jews, and all those who support them. They must be nursed on hatred. The hatred must continue.” (Emphasis mine.)

This is the heartbeat of the Muslim Brotherhood. The “hatred” they nurse includes the United States, which is a major supporter of Israel and the Jewish people.

Obama’s “fight” for Islam continued as he appointed members of the Muslim Brotherhood as advisers to the White House who have tremendous influence upon national and foreign policies. His fight spread to the FBI as they purged its training manuals of any words that had a reference to Islam, Islamic terrorism, Muslim, Muslim Brotherhood and Sharia. The FBI is now being influenced by radical Islamist organizations in the training of its agents, which is also happening in Tennessee under the watch of Gov. Haslam.

Obama’s “fight” for Islam spread to the United States military with the Fort Hood shooting. Major Nidal Hasan killed 13 unarmed American soldiers and wounded over 30 as he yelled “Allahu Akbar,” the familiar battle cry of Islamists that precedes the killing of innocent American lives.

Under President Obama’s leadership as Commander in Chief, the Department of Defense categorized the killings as “workplace violence” instead of a terrorist attack or Islamist jihad. Why? Because President Obama’s “fight against negative stereotypes of Islam wherever they may appear” includes soldiers killed on American soil. He could not allow this shooting to taint Islam’s reputation.

In April of 2012, President Obama circumvented Congressional Law by sending $192 million to the Palestinian Authority. He stated that the waiver was “important to the security interests of the United States.” This was during the time that the Consulate in Benghazi was begging for security upgrades and ended in the loss of four American lives. His “fight” for Islam is so ardent that the “security interests of the United States” apparently does not extend to Americans in a consulate.

After the four Americans were murdered in Benghazi, Obama made the following statement at the United Nations, “The future does not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.” He was referencing the “video” that he and his administration claimed was the cause of the attack in Benghazi, which was an unadulterated lie. Obama was protecting “negative stereotypes of Islam” even if he had to lie about it before the world.

To remind the Islamic world of his commitment to Islam, and to accentuate his “fight against “negative stereotypes of Islam wherever they may appear,” U.S. attorney Bill Killian and Special FBI Agent Moore went to Manchester, Tenn., on June 4, 2013. Islamists understand the importance of dates regarding events, and this event was designed to suppress the First Amendment right of free speech toward those who would make negative statements against Islam, its prophet and its followers. His “fight” for Islam is censuring free speech and shredding the Constitution before our eyes.

Obama set his agenda in Cairo, and he is fulfilling it abroad and at home in America. If what is happening abroad is an indication as to what will happen in America, Americans should be highly concerned. If Americans are going to remain a free people, silence is not an option. We must become active against this type of unconstitutional and tyrannical behavior.


Does the Istanbul Process have something to do with Benghazi?

by William Federer

Are there places in the world where these types of laws [to limit free speech] have already been implemented, and by what process?

In 2005, there were Muslim riots in Europe after a Dutch cartoon was published. The European Union quickly mandated religious-hate-speech codes which prohibit insulting Islam.

Riots, and the process of inciting them, has been a political tactic dating as far back as Rome’s Mark Anthony; or the French Revolution’s Robespierre; or Chicago Labor’s 1886 Haymarket Riot; or Bill Ayers’ Chicago Days of Rage.

Stalin said: “Crisis alone permitted the authorities to demand and obtain total submission and all necessary sacrifices from its citizens.”
…In the vein of “Fast and Furious,” if there could, just by chance, be a spontaneous riot incited that could be blamed on someone insulting Islam, then there would be the justification for a hurried rush for Americans to give up their free speech rights.The State Department’s prompt actions the day after the attack seemingly added credence to this.

…Another voice calling for the effective implementation of the Istanbul Process was Zbigniew Brzezinski, Jimmy Carter’s national security advisor. Brzezinski was instrumental in arming fundamentalist Muslims in Afghanistan against the Soviet Union.
…President Obama, Hillary Clinton, Susan Rice and Jay Carney went on for weeks trying to convince the world that the Benghazi killings were the result of a video and called for limits on free speech insulting Islam.

Al Jazeera English reported on Sept. 20, 2012 that the State Department even bought $70,000 worth of airtime in Pakistan with which to blame the video. The commercials were broadcast on “Love your Prophet” Friday.

Whether Obama and Clinton were simply acting as politicians trying to deflect the blame for the Benghazi killings or whether they were using the Alinsky tactics to implement the Istanbul Process and U.N. Resolution 16/18, only continued scrutiny of congressional hearings and media focus can shed some light.

Either way, their immediate response was to “never waste a good crisis” in achieving political ends.

‘Arab Spring’ Explodes in Attacks Against America

by Clare Lopez

…these were acts of war. There can be no question but that they were coordinated acts of war, purposely timed to fall on America’s solemn day of commemoration of the worst jihadist attacks ever committed on the U.S. homeland (by Iran and al-Qa’eda, which sprang from the Muslim Brotherhood).

Diplomatic facilities are the sovereign territory of the country to which they belong. The host country is responsible for their security – and even though neither Egyptian nor Libyan uniformed government forces directly participated in the attacks, it is obvious that their Muslim Brotherhood supporters, the ones who elected them to office and who are now calling for jihad and sharia, were.

Moreover, it is also clear that the U.S. Department of State was aware of the impending threat to its facilities over the film because its Cairo Embassy issued a despicable statement of abject appeasement in advance of the attacks that offered up the treasured right of American free speech on the altar of Islamophobia.

U.S. Embassy Condemns Religious Incitement

September 11, 2012

The Embassy of the United States in Cairo condemns the continuing efforts by misguided individuals to hurt the religious feelings of Muslims – as we condemn efforts to offend believers of all religions. Today, the 11th anniversary of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the United States, Americans are honoring our patriots and those who serve our nation as the fitting response to the enemies of democracy. Respect for religious beliefs is a cornerstone of American democracy. We firmly reject the actions by those who abuse the universal right of free speech to hurt the religious beliefs of others.

That statement came directly out of the talking points of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) on its Ten-Year Programme of Action and is intended by both the OIC and the U.S. Department of State to impose legal limits on Americans’ freedom of speech by criminalizing criticism of Islam. Recall that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton hosted OIC Secretary General Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu in Washington, D.C. in mid-December 2011 to discuss implementation mechanisms for “Resolution 16/18,” a declaration adopted by the U.N. Human Rights Council in April 2011. Resolution 16/18 calls on countries to combat “intolerance, negative stereotyping and stigmatization” based on religion without criminalizing free speech – except in cases of “incitement to imminent violence.” If now the measure of “incitement to imminent violence” is a “test of consequences” that imposes prior restraint on freedom of expression because of the unpredictability of volatile Muslim populaces easily roused to murderous fury, as in Benghazi and Cairo, then Islamic law on slander will have been enforced.

This is the real meaning of these attacks, which were purposefully calculated precisely to elicit the craven press release quoted above from the U.S. State Department. This is how dhimmitude is implemented. Islamic Jihad and Gama’a al-Islamiyya demands for the release of Omar Abdul Rahman (the “Blind Sheikh”), now serving a life sentence in U.S. federal prison for his involvement in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, also have been issued, along with a threat to burn the U.S. Cairo Embassy to the ground if these demands are not met.

We are witnessing the stepped process of the Islamization of American domestic and foreign policy unfold before our eyes and in accordance with both Sayyed Qutb’s classic book “Milestones,” as well as a November 2011 fatwa from Yousef al-Qaradawi, the Muslim Brotherhood’s senior jurist, in which he said, “Gradualism in applying the Sharia is a wise requirement to follow.”

The timeline began to shift into high gear in the summer of 2010, however, when al-Qa’eda called the Muslim world to action, a call answered in October 2010 by Muhammad Badi’ with a declaration of war (jihad) against the U.S., Israel, and Arab and Muslim regimes which were “disregarding Allah’s commandment to wage jihad.” The shift to active, violent jihad reflected obedience to al-Qaradawi’s further fatwa injunction, “Gradualism in that sense does not mean we are to procrastinate and put off applying the Sharia.”

The new Caliphate is rising under the leadership of the OIC through the directed action of its individual member states in coordination with the Muslim Brotherhood. Violent jihad is unleashed, and the United States of America is bowing to sharia on satellite TV and the global internet for all the world to see.

As of late Tuesday night, September 11, there had been not one word of criticism of the Benghazi or Cairo attacks from President Obama. State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland seemed oblivious to the magnitude of what had just transpired, telling one reporter who mentioned “growing anti-U.S. sentiment” in Egypt, “I would urge you not to draw too many conclusions because we’ve also had some very positive developments in our relationship with Egypt.”

By this she clarified that she meant that Egyptians are undergoing a transition to democracy and are now free to protest … including against the very benefactor who not only helped them oust their long-time military rulers but has just delivered its annual $1.5 billion in aid and promised another billion in debt relief.

As the flag of al-Qa’eda flies over the U.S. Embassy in Cairo and the RPGs slam into the Benghazi Consulate; as Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood president talks nuclear programs with Iran and the American president abandons Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu to the mullahs or Armageddon, the “Arab Spring” is completely unmasked.

This was no spontaneous outburst of oppressed peoples dreaming of democracy and individual liberty. This was the Islamic Awakening dreamed of for centuries by Sunni and Shi’a alike. Al-Qa’eda and the Muslim Brotherhood at last have merged visibly in a sea of waving black flags.


%d bloggers like this: