• Religion Of Peace

  • Archives

  • Elisabeth was found guilty of hate speech crimes for speaking the truth about Islam. Click to donate to her legal defense fund

  • Categories

  • Meta

  • This blogsite / website is not the official website of ACT! for America, Inc. This blogsite / website is independently owned and operated by that ACT! for America chapter named on this site. The statements, positions, opinions and views expressed in this website, whether written, audible, or video, are those of the individuals and organizations making them and and do not necessarily represent the positions, views, and opinions of ACT! for America, Inc., its directors, officers, or agents. The sole official website of ACT! for America, Inc. is www.actforamerica.org
  • Statements, views, positions and opinions expressed in articles, columns, commentaries and blog posts, whether written, audible, or video, which are not the original work of the ACT! for America chapter that owns and operates this website / blogsite, and is named on this website / blogsite are not necessarily the views, positions, and opinions of the ACT! for America chapter that owns and operates this website / blogsite

#Sharia in HOUSTON: Prosecutors say father killed 2 in “honor killings”

By Brian Rogers

Ali Mahwood-Awad Irsan, 57, who is accused of gunning down an Iranian medical student, Gelareh Bagherzadeh in January 2012, appeared in 184th state District court on Thursday, April 30, 2015, in Houston. Photo: Karen Warren, Houston Chronicle / © 2015 Houston Chronicle

…Irsan is accused of gunning down an Iranian medical student, Gelareh Bagherzadeh, as she drove to her parents’ home in January 2012.

He is charged with capital murder because prosecutors believe he also fatally shot his daughter’s husband, 28-year-old Coty Beavers, months later as part of the same scheme.

Irsan was incensed that his adult daughter defied him and married a Christian man, prosecutors said. Bagherzadeh was her best friend and seen as encouraging his daughter.

In court Thursday, Assistant Harris County District Attorney Tammy Thomas said Irsan called his daughter after Bagherzadeh was dead and threatened her.

“He said, ‘I killed that bitch, and you’re next. No one insults my honor as a Muslim and gets away with it,'” Thomas told state District Judge Jan Crocker….

More

See also: Prosecutors in “honor killings” case tell judge of hit list against witnesses

Islam Will Dominate

“…Notice how clear and frank Dr. Malkawi is about what must happen to Western political and judicial structures: they must fall. They must give way to Islam. There will be no governance but Islamic governance. This must be the case, because Allah has decreed it so.

This is how things were in London twenty-one years ago. What are they like now?”

More at Gates of Vienna

TONIGHT: Welcome Islam!!!???

This is a historical overview covering 1400 years including specific focus on current situations.
This is a great opportunity to bring family or friends who don’t know much about Islam, but would like to learn more.
************
 
Please join us!
Free and open to the public.
7 PM
Location:
West Houston Bible Church
1500 West Sam Houston Parkway, N. Suite 104
Houston, TX 77043

Denying the real motivation for Islamist terrorism

The call to violence is found in a literal reading of the Koran

By Brooke Goldstein

Illustrations on the violent implications of the Koran by Alexander Hunter/The Washington Times

Islamists are winning their war to silence critical commentary in the West about Islam. So says Flemming Rose, culture editor of the Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten, which originally published the now-infamous images of Muhammad, in his recent book, “The Tyranny of Silence.”

Whether motivated by a cowardly nature or by an obsequious desire to be nice, much of the media and the Obama administration now adhere to a common vocabulary when discussing violence motivated by Islamist theology. There is simply no reference to the theological motivations so relevant to the perpetrators of religiously inspired terror.

We are told that The Islamic State is not Islamic (rather a terrorist “jayvee team”), the Taliban is not an Islamist terrorist group (rather an “insurgency”), the Charlie Hebdo massacres were not coordinated by radical Islamists (rather “individual terrorists”), the Fort Hood murders were not acts of terror (rather “workplace violence”), the terrorist attack on our embassy in Libya was not instigated by imams preaching Islamic blasphemy laws (rather by our own exercise of free speech) and so on.

In fact, the U.S. government has purged the worlds “Islam” and “jihad,” and any language deemed “Islamophobic,” from counterterrorism training manuals, thereby neutering the ability of U.S. law enforcement to identify the motivational factors behind Islamist terrorism.

However, the ad nauseam repetition that “Islam is a religion of peace” every time a terror attack is carried out in the name of Islam no longer has any traction. Even some who, in the past, felt impelled to employ fatuous statements about the lack of Islam’s responsibility for Islamist terrorism seem recently to have constrained themselves. For instance, at a recent panel discussing the “Causes of Radicalization” at the National Press Club, Shadi Hamid of the Brookings Institution commented that he no longer feels comfortable employing this phrase. Muslims must admit that for many, terrorist violence has become Islam, he said, adding, “ISIS has emerged out of a particular context.”

No matter how much the White House wants to deny it, the Islamic State group version of Islam is very real for its crucified and decapitated victims. Saudi Arabia’s version of Islam is very much a reality for the homosexual teenagers publicly hung for defiling Wahhabi Islam. Boko Haram’s version of Islam is very real for the children slaughtered while attending schools deemed too westernized for the group’s convictions. And the Taliban’s version of Islam is very real for the women put to death for being raped or walking without a male escort, both violations of the Pushtun traditional social code of honor as encapsulated by Shariah law. These violent versions of Islam, prevalent in the Muslim world to varying degrees, must be studied, debated and taken very seriously, especially within our counterterrorism apparatus….

More

MONDAY: CHRIS BYRD ON ALAC

Join us on Monday, March 9, 7 PM.

Chris Byrd will speak on ALAC- American Law for American Courts.

J. Christopher Byrd, Trial Attorney Counsel, Center for Security Policy, Washington, D.C., Texas Counsel, Act for America, MBA/CPA, Former Judge, Former National Bank Examiner, Comptroller of the Currency, U.S. Treasury Dept., Former Risk Manager, Ultramar Diamond Shamrock, Rotarian

 

Why does Texas need legislation to protect its jurisprudence? J. Christopher Byrd, Esq., our featured speaker, will explain the need for legislation requiring American law for American courts, known as ALAC. Aspects of Sharia have found their way into Texas and other American courtrooms.

As recognition of Sharia and other foreign law is being demanded in courtrooms across the country, nine states have passed constitutionally sound ALAC legislation.

As Counsel for the Center for Public Policy in Washington D.C. and Act for America, Mr. Byrd focuses his efforts on fighting the advance of Sharia in America. Mr. Byrd recently testified in Texas Senate committee hearings against the Muslim Brotherhood in favor of American Laws for American Courts and in an effort to protect Texas from Sharia. He continues this effort with others in Texas to safeguard our constitution and rights of liberty.

Location: West Houston Bible Church, 1450 West Sam Houston Pkwy N, Houston, TX 77043

 

Pakistan: Can Sharia and Freedom Coexist?

Sharia Adherent Muslims Are Not “Extremists”

By John Guandolo

The U.S. government continues to label the Islamic terrorists we face as “violent extremists” who commit acts of “workplace violence.”  Here at Understanding the Threat (UTT) we prefer to live in reality because it is the only place our enemies can be defeated.

The phrase “violent extremism” is a non-sensical term and was brought to the U.S. via the FBI and DHS who were convinced by our British counterparts it identifies our enemies.  In fact, it identifies anyone who is willing to support their beliefs with violence.  In this light, U.S. military forces and any American willing to defend a just cause can be classified as a “violent extremist.”

Unfortunately, those participating in the global Islamic jihad do not call themselves “extremists.”  They call themselves “Jihadis” who wage jihad until the entire world is under Sharia (Islamic Law).  American war fighting doctrine states we begin our analysis of any enemy by how that enemy describes itself.

This enemy specifically states it seeks to impose Sharia and it is the blueprint for everything it does.  Jihad is total warfare.  It is Civilization Jihad per the Muslim Brotherhood’s own strategic plan for North America, and the MB’s global strategy.  Jihad is warfare that comes at a society in a hundred different ways:  politically, economically, psychologically, spiritually, culturally, societally, and it includes violence of many kinds both in the community and on the battlefield.

Sharia is the filter through which this enemy communicates and understands the world.  This is why it is crucial that we also use Sharia when we hear our adversaries speak so we can properly understand what the enemy intends.  In the Sharia, “Terrorism” is killing a Muslim without right; “Human Rights” is the imposition of Sharia (per the Cairo Declaration, a formal document served to the UN by the entire Muslim world via the OIC in 1993); and “Extremism” is when a Muslim exceeds his ability or authority.

Nowhere in the Muslim world do Islamic jihadi organizations call themselves “extremists” – they call themselves “Jihadis.”…

More

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,759 other followers

%d bloggers like this: