More Evidence of America’s Wrongheaded Approach to Jihad

By Christopher Holton

It has been over 9 months since Jihadist terrorists attacked a US diplomatic facility in Benghazi, Libya and killed 4 Americans, including the US ambassador to Libya, Christopher Stevens.

Make no mistake, an attack on a diplomatic facility is an act of war. And Christopher Stevens was the first US ambassador killed in the line of duty in over 30 years.

Despite this, America finds itself mired in a scandal surrounding this incident and the Obama administration’s shameful handling of it. Meanwhile, there has been no response from America to this act of war. That transmits profound weakness to the world, more importantly to the Middle East and, most vitally, to our Jihadist enemies.

This week, as if to add insult to injury, we have learned that US FBI officials have identified five suspects in the attack.

This report is troubling because it further demonstrates that the US is firmly back into a “September 10th” posture of dealing with Jihadist terrorism as a law enforcement issue and not warfare. This is plainly seen in this statement from BreitBart.com on the issue:

U.S. officials say they have identified five men they believe might be behind the attack on the diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, last year. The officials say they have enough evidence to justify seizing them by military force as suspected terrorists _ but not enough proof to try them in a U.S. civilian court as the Obama administration prefers.

So the officials say the men remain at large while the FBI gathers more evidence. The decision not to seize the men militarily underscores the White House’s aim to move away from hunting terrorists as enemy combatants and toward trying them as criminals in a civilian justice system.

Every American should be outraged by this. The Jihadists are at war with us. Mere membership in a Jihadist terrorist organization, such as the Ansar al-Shariah reported to be involved in the Benghazi attack, should be enough to justify covert or overt US force. Because the Obama administration does not see it that way, there are members of Jihadist terrorist organizations who have been identified but are roaming free, possibly–even probably–planning more attacks on US targets, with little fear of retaliation.

When the US does not retaliate for attacks on our diplomatic facilities in which US citizens are killed, we  are viewed as weak, especially in the Middle East. Evidentiary standards for use in a US court are not appropriate for warfare. Targeting individual members is the wrong strategy for dealing with Jihadist terrorist organizations. The Obama-Holder-Clinton-Kerry cabal has made a train wreck out of US counterterrorism efforts and the Jihadists have metastasized on their watch as a result.

Link

Jihad in America

By Joseph Puder

On the bright, beautiful, and crisp fall day that was early morning, September 11, 2001, few Americans were familiar with stealth jihad, or considered Islamic terrorism a threat to America.  Yet, there was a voice crying in the wilderness, warning of a danger that already existed here.  That voice belonged to Steven Emerson, whose documentary film titled Jihad in America was aired by PBS on November 21, 1994.  Islamic militant groups in America, including CAIR (the Council on American-Islamic Relations) began their protestations and intimidation even before the broadcast date.  Since the airing, the use of intimidation has been ramped up and gone global, having a stifling impact on terrorism/jihad-related broadcasts in the mainstream media throughout the Western world. This oppressive atmosphere has affected the conduct of Western governments, including the Obama administration.

Emerson’s newly released Jihad in America: The Grand Deception is a must-watch documentary — an educational tool for Americans to learn about the network of stealth Islamist jihadists in the U.S. that has grown in the aftermath of 9/11.  The fact that evil lurks just under the surface in America (brought to life last month at the Boston Marathon) seems to be difficult to acknowledge, yet ignoring it is at our peril.  Unfortunately, Americans have a short memory span, and most prefer to turn away from unpleasant realities, especially in the Obama Age.  Hence, all the more reason to circulate information about this essential documentary.

The 70-minute documentary by Steven Emerson’s Investigative Project on Terrorism (IPT) deals with the covert structure and growing influence of the Muslim Brotherhood (Ikhwan al-Muslimun) and other such radical Muslim groups, masquerading under the deceitful moniker of apolitical religious groups, as well as civil rights groups in the U.S. This IPT documentary reveals how the Muslim Brotherhood (MB) has infiltrated the highest institutions of the land, including the Obama White House, the U.S. Congress, U.S. Departments of State and Homeland Security, Hollywood, the mainstream media, law enforcement in various states, the publishing industry and American museums.  The film not only presents examples of MB infiltration, but reveals how the MB and its affiliates intimidate policymakers to submit to their demands by their use of our open democracy to undermine our institutions, all of which is done to further their quest for global rule under Sharia law.

This film includes previously unseen interviews with articulate and most courageous Muslim individuals, former FBI agents and federal prosecutors, a prominent Hollywood director, journalists, as well as a top official of the Muslim Brotherhood.  This documentary features secretly recorded audio and video speeches of radical Islamists, including individual preachers and groups, original MB documents, and unsealed federal documents….

More

Stephen Coughlin: Boston, Jihad & the Media Narrative

Islam’s True Colors

by LT. COLONEL JAMES G. ZUMWALT, USMC (RET)

In the fairy tale “Little Red Riding Hood,” a young girl almost gets eaten by a wolf disguised as her grandmother. The moral of the story: Be careful whom you trust.

Learned early by children, the moral isn’t always retained by adults. Scams often victimize those too trusting.

When honest endorsers naively lend their high-profile name to such a scam, investors foolishly assume their investment is safe. But those blindly accepting endorsements as gospel without independent investigation court disaster.

Investigative responsibility especially arises when endorsers promote investments outside their expertise parameters, such as churches sanctioning political party agendas effecting U.S. national security.

Such an endorsement was given by the Presbyterian Church (USA). It is a political scam artist’s dream.

The church’s intentions are good — seeking to embrace another religion in an act of equality. But it fails to recognize the threat this other religion poses to Presbyterianism’s future existence — a religion hiding a deadly political agenda it silently promotes.

The religion is Islam. It lacks tolerance for non-Muslims under a religious/political system of laws known as “Shariah” — so adverse to the U.S. Constitution, supporting one system excludes the other.

Islamists predicted in a strategy document they wrote, Americans will awaken too late to realize the Constitution has been targeted.

Before embracing Islam as a religion amongst equals, the Presbyterian Church needs to understand how Islam’s Koran views all other religions.

Concealed within Islam is a political belief system of superiority (Koran 3:110, “You are the best of peoples ever raised up for mankind”), entitling its believers alone to human rights — limited as they are. Presbyterian Church leaders opening their arms in a show of tolerance fail to understand Islam’s sinister designs to displace Presbyterianism, and all other religions, based on this belief.

Hard to believe? These designs are recorded in a 1991 strategic document Islamist leaders of the Muslim Brotherhood wrote explaining how to topple U.S. democracy by paralleling Prophet Muhammad’s successful actions in imposing Islam upon others 14 centuries ago.

Discreetly circulated, the strategy paper seeks to use America’s penchant for tolerance and political correctness against it, slowly replacing the U.S. Constitution with Shariah. “Shariah creep” is already making headway!

Found stored in a hidden sub-basement during the 2004 search of a Muslim leader’s U.S. home, the documents are most telling concerning the strategy’s success — evidenced today by the Presbyterian Church’s endorsement of various Islamic Muslim Brotherhood-affiliated entities (including unindicted co-conspirators in a fraud case that funneled money to terrorist groups)….

….Transitioning from stealth to offensive jihad, the Koran changes tunes. Gone from the latter is the “Kumbaya” of the former; allegations of Muslims’ false victimization give way to real victimization of non-Muslims to “convert or die.”

Islam is built upon a platform of hypocrisy, deception, human rights rejection for non-believers and violence (demanding death for apostates, contrary to any other religion’s practices).

Culling extremists from the supposedly majority peace-loving Muslim herd is difficult as taqiyya allows deception, raising the question whether moderates are wolves in sheep’s clothing. If Islam is peaceful, moderates have much explaining to do about a Koran strongly revealing a contrary view.

The Muslim Brotherhood’s strategy is its blueprint for overcoming democracies throughout the West — only differing on timing. The United States is in stealth jihad; Europe is in defensive jihad; offensive jihad is yet to come.

But, as extremists boldly declare, Islam’s flag one day will fly over the White House.

The chameleon changes color to deceive predators. Islam changes color to deceive non-believers. Little Red Riding Hood proved capable of sensing such deception. Will the West prove equally as capable?

More

Muslim Mommy Dearest

By Jamie Glazov

Hideous monster

….As you have also probably noticed, Muslims shout “Allahu Akbar!” in the process of killing or raping kafirs (dirty non-Muslims) – like the Muslims who recently raped two Christian women in broad daylight in Egypt. Our media, of course, always rushes to inform us that this Islamic-Arabic expression is translated as “God is Great,” so that we can all be rest assured that Islam means us no harm — and that the particular Muslims screaming it while slicing our throats have somehow misunderstood their peaceful religion somewhere along the way. The tiny problem, of course, is that, asDaniel Greenfield shrewdly crystallizes:

Allahu Akbar doesn’t mean Allah is Great, in a “Isn’t ‘Allah and the Virgins of Paradise’ a great band.” It’s more like Allah is Greatest or Superior. And if you’re on the right side of the cockpit door, the one doing the shouting ‘Allahu Akbar’ means that Allah is superior to your country and to you. And one of his followers is about to do his best to show you why.

“Allahu Akbar,” in other words, is an expression of Muslim hate and superiority — which means, of course, Allah’s hate and superiority. Allah hates and is superior to all the lesser (and non-existent) gods that the kafir so insolently and ignorantly worships. And that’s why, as 67% of the Meccan Koran and 51% of the Medinan Koran mandate, the kafir needs to be reviled, subjugated and killed. The Muslim, meanwhile, who is a slave to Allah, must also not stick around too long; indeed, he needs to end his own life, sooner rather than later, for Allah – as long as it’s done in the process of killing some kafirs. The Muslim’s life on earth is, after all, by Allah’s decree, pointless, since he is completely worthless as an individual. (The very opposite of the Judeo-Christian tradition’s view of the individual.) And the only way he can get into Islamic paradise and get access to the 72 virgins is through Jihad.

This is the lovely context in which we come to understand the exhilarating life of Zubeidat Tsarnaeva. She is our Muslim Mommy Dearest. And who better for her to take after than the Palestinian Muslim Mommy Dearest:Umm Nidal (Mariam Farhat), who was known in certain circles as theMother of Martyrs or, depending on what your milieu is, the Mother From Hell. Umm Nidal, you see, liked to engage in infanticide, particularly when it came to her own kids. She passed away this past March, but the legacy she left behind still brings tears to the eyes of Muslims around the world who loved her, and who were touched by what she did for Allah.

Umm Nidal distinguished herself most effectively in a Hamas recruitment video in which she toted a gun and taught her 17-year-old son (Muhammed) how to murder Jews — and then sternly warned him not to come back after he had succeeded in that particular Muslim delicacy (the highest priorityissued by the prophet of Islam). The son faithfully followed out the instructions of the Mother From Hell and made sure he was mortally shot after storming an Israeli settlement and successfully killing five Jews and wounding 23. Umm Nidal rejoiced; she cried out “Allahu Akbar” and then handed out halva and chocolates to her dead son’s friends.

And that was not the end of Umm Nidal’s ecstasy. She also took great delight in the fact that two of her other sons died in Jihad against the Jews. One was blown up by his own explosives that he made to target Israeli civilians; the other was killed by Israeli intelligence….

More